While reading through what feels like a million research articles in search of thesis material, I seem to come across quite a few that almost gloss over the impact of trauma on a developing child. It would seem that the overwhelming opinion is that children are “resilient” and with a little therapy will move past a trauma and simply keep on truckin’. I have a serious problem with this.
My research has centered mainly on former “lost boys”, or former child soldiers. The trauma experienced by this population is nothing short of horrific, and fortunately most children do not experience trauma of this nature. In any case, most research claims that a few months of group and individual therapy can overcome years of violence, drug use, rape, and murder. The child’s PTSD (the diagnosis given to 99.9% of former child soldiers) is simply addressed for a few months and follow-up studies show that the effects of therapy are long-lasting. WHAT??!! Sure, follow-up shows effectiveness because you’re simply asking them a few questions as to whether or not they feel anxious or depressed. Have you asked how they cope with emotionally charged situations, how they envision their family structure, how violence has shaped their self-worth and sense of self, or how rape has impacted interpersonal relations?
I proposed in my initial drafts that a more whole-person approach is necessary to adequately address the multitude of problems that arise from childhood experiences such as soldiering. Precious few research endeavors have addressed the impact of trauma on the world-view, emotional schema, and self-concept of children. I find it sad that most people simply view children as “resilient”, expecting them to move on and be fine in the long-run. How can you expect a child to adequately process the act of killing his/her family members? It’s ok, he’s resilient, right?
